I’m afraid I’ve been neglecting my blog of late – too much work. However, several people have pointed out to me that there’s an election happening, and at least one or two people like to know my comments and recommendations before they vote. (That’s not to say they follow my recommendations. They just like to know them. For all I know, they may turn around and do the exact opposite!
So, for what it’s worth, here’s my two cents on the June ballot:
Presidential primary — what’s to say? It’s already decided. Let’s just move on. We’ll come back to this
before the November election.
U.S. Senate — Well, this is the first time we’ve had all the candidates on one ballot. Kinda interesting. Lots of Republicans, a few Democrats, two Peace and Freedom, and one American Independent and one Libertarian. I confess to knowing very little about most of the candidates. I do note that most of the Republicans are businessmen/women. I guess that kinda figures. I’m not particularly thrilled with Feinstein, but it probably won’t make much difference; she’ll win by a landslide anyhow. Just for the heck of it, you might try voting for Marsha Feinland, one of the Peace & Freedom candidates. I think this is her third or fourth time running against Feinstein, so at least she’s got a bit of experience at being a candidate.
U.S. Representative — In the 13th Congressional District, where I am, there’s no real contest. Barbara Lee has voted the way I would have on almost every issue, and has been one of the leaders in trying to get us extricated from Afghanistan. Would that there were more like her. Speaking of which, if you live in Pete Stark’s district, please vote for him. He’s been a stalwart supporter of good things like single-payer healthcare and an opponent of military spending for years and years. Yes, he’s getting older, but his votes still work for me.
For State Senator, Loni Hancock is running unopposed, as is Nancy Skinner for State Assembly. Loni has been fighting the good fight for many years, so I can’t complain about her being unopposed. Nancy Skinner, on the other hand has, in my opinion, been much less impressive. However, since she’s unopposed, your only other option is to leave her space blank. (A write-in wouldn’t count.)
For County Supervisor, in my district, District Five, there’s again no contest. Keith Carson is running unopposed. Being county supervisor in the current economic climate is no fun, so I don’t begrudge Keith his seat.
Finally, we do have one local contested race — Alameda County Superior Court Judge. This is nonpartisan, and there’s no incumbent, so you’ve basically got three attorneys who want to be a judge. I don’t know any of the three, and have only their candidate statements to go on. Based on that, however, I’d choose Andrew Wiener. His emphasis on trying to reduce the adversarial atmosphere of the courtroom and promote negotiated settlements is, to my mind, a very worthwhile one.
Last, but certainly not least, there are the ballot measures. There are two statewide measures, 28 and 29, and one local measure, a $48 per year parcel tax for the community college district.
Proposition 28 would modify the state term limit law by reducing the maximum [lifetime] allowance from 14 years to 12 but allowing those 12 to be served in either house, by the candidate’s preference. I have never been a fan of term limits. As a lawyer who deals with state laws, I’ve seen a definite decline in the quality of legislation since term limits were enacted. What do you expect? By the time you figure out how to write good laws, you’re termed out. At least with this proposal, you could spend your years in one house and perhaps learn it better. YES
Proposition 29 would put a $1 a pack additional state tax on cigarettes. The No campaign is being funded almost entirely by the tobacco industry. Now there is an evil empire! The only [legitimate] thing that can be said against this measure is it may increase the amount of illegally sold cigarettes in the state, and perhaps in that way contribute to organized crime. However, there’s more than enough money to be made selling other drugs, so I don’t think that’s a big concern. Other than that, if the higher prices deter a few people from smoking, so much the better. It is sad, however, how many poor, uneducated people are smokers. 😦 YES
Measure B – $48 per year parcel tax to help fund Peralta Community College District. This community college district has had more than its share of scandals, but whose fault is that? Ours. After all, we elect its governing board. If they don’t do a good job, we ought to run better people for office. All that having been said, Thanks to the recession and Prop. 13, the District, like all other public educational institutions, is strapped for funds. The community colleges are especially important because this is about the only place left where working class kids can get an education beyond high school. (That’s a sad commentary on the state of California’s once glorious higher education system!) YES.