Yet another election flier came in today’s mail. This one, yet another extolling the virtues of mayoral candidate Don Perata, came from a shadowy committee called, “Oakland Jobs PAC.” It apparently cost $30,155. Remembering deep throat’s advice of “follow the money,” I set out to try to figure out where that $30,155 came from. It’s not easy. The Secretary of State’s website lists it as a “Recipient Committee,” but shows no recent donation or expenditures.
Since it’s spending money on the Oakland mayoral race, Oakland Jobs PAC presumably has to file with the Oakland City Clerk’s office. Unfortunately, none of those filings are available on-line. [Note to city officials — if you’re going to go to the trouble of passing campaign finance legislation, it only makes sense to require that the filings be posted on-line. There aren’t too many people with the time, energy and knowledge to go down to the city clerk’s office and sift through the hundreds of filings that have been made to find out, for example, who gave the $30 K that Oakland Jobs spent on Perata’s behalf.]
There is a little more information available about Oakland Jobs PAC. They’re the same people who spent a wad of money supporting Kerry Hamill two years ago in her run for the at-large seat on the city council. If you’ll remember, part of that was for posters that tried to tie Hammill to “safe neighborhoods”. Both Hamill and Oakland Jobs PAC supported the Safe Streets Initiative, which would have required Oakland to beef up its police force to over a thousand officers. (It didn’t however, provide any explanation about where the city was going to find the funds to pay for all those extra officers.) Seems like there’s a theme here, with both Hamill’s and Perata’s campaigns hitting heavily on public safety and the need to hire more police officers. (It should also be noted that Hamill was Perata’s chief of staff in the legislature from 1996 to 2000.)
But, that still doesn’t say where the money’s coming from. Another hint — a campaign filing listed their address as Nielsen Merksamer, a Marin County law firm that specializes in election law and was hired by Signature Properties to help keep a referendum on the Oak to Ninth Project off the ballot. Also perhaps significant is that the executive director of Oakland Jobs PAC, Greg McConnell, is a lobbyist who lists Signature Properties (along with another big Oakland developer, Forest Cities) as among his chief clients. McConnell was also apparently instrumental in forming another group, the Better Housing Coalition, that organized Oakland’s large developers to oppose an inclusionary housing ordinance that was being considered by the city council. Based on this, my guess is that a Perata administration would not be very interested in pursuing inclusionary housing.
Not having pored through the city clerk’s files, I can’t yet tell you where the “independent” money supporting Perata’s campaign is coming from, but if the past is any indication, there appears to be a strong likelihood that the dots will eventually connect to the major developers doing business in Oakland. As for why they would do that, well, again, if the past is any indication, it’s because they expect there to be a large pot of gold at the end of the rainbow with Don Perata’s name on it.
I must say that all this is not very surprising to me. It’s exactly how I’d expect Perata to run his campaign. It certainly doesn’t give me any cause to revise my voting recommendations for Oakland mayor.